Tuesday, May 23, 2017
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
LG X Venture Smartphone Will is Built for Adventure
HP Debuts New Premium PC Portfolio Taking On Microsoft's Surface Models
U.S. Remains the Top Market for VR, Followed by Japan
JDI's Electronic Paper Backplane Enables Creation of 600ppi ePaper Displays
Samsung to Showcase 'Stretchable' OLED, Glasses-free 3D OLED At SID 2017
WikiLeaks Says 'Athena' CIA Spying Program Targets All Versions of Windows
Holograms Could be the Future of Near-eye Displays
Samsung Chromebook Pro Available on May 28 For $550
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge R...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Judge Rejects Samsung's Demand For New Trial, Apple's Patent Award Demands


A court in California on Tuesday denied Samsung a retrial in a patent infringement dispute with Apple, and also declined to raise the damages earlier awarded to Apple.

The court also granted judgment as matter of law that Samsung's patent infringement was not willful - a finding that could have formed the basis to triple the damages owed by Samsung.

Last August, a jury decided that that the Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing design and utility patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury was untruthful and biased.

On Tuesday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, said the jury "had ample opportunity to compensate Apple for Samsung's use of its product designs." The jury awarded $382 million in damages for six products found to have diluted Apple's trade dress patents, but Apple filed for an additional $400 million. "Apple had not clearly shown that it was not adequately compensated for the losses it suffered due to Samsung's dilution of its trade dress in its products," Judge Koh wrote.

The Judge also denied Samsung's motion for judgement that none of Samsung's accused phones infringed Apple's design patents, and also denied Samsung's motion in the for a new trial.

The court also ruled against Samsung's claim that some Apple patents in the suit were invalid for indefiniteness, while granting an Apple plea that claims of a Samsung patent were invalid.


Previous
Next
Smaller Apple TV In The Works        All News        Nintendo Wii U Fails To Boost The Company's Profits
Sony's Music Unlimited Service To Offer High-Quality Audio     General Computing News      LG Reports Revenue Decrease, Operating Profits For 2012

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Apple To Upgrade MacBooks This Summer
Samsung Pay Launches in the U.K.
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Said To Have Dual-cameras
Accessory Line-up for the Samsung Galaxy S8 and Galaxy S8+
Samsung Creates New Chip Foundry Division
Apple Invests $200M In Corning
Samsung Names New Mobile Marketing Chief
Samsung Display Breaks Ground For New Flexible OLED Fab
Apple Buys Sleep Tracking App Maker Beddit
Apple Becomes World's No.1 Wearables Vendor in Q1 2017
Analyst Places Netflix, Tesla In Potential Takeover Targets for Apple
Qualcomm Wants to Ban iPhones

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2017 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .