Tuesday, December 06, 2016
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Samsung in Smartphone Patent Suit
TSMC And IBM Detail Their 7nm Progress At 2016 IEDM
Oculus Touch Now Available
European Commission Approves Acquisition of LinkedIn by Microsoft, Subject to Conditions
Google To Go Completely Green Using Renewable Energy Only
Yahoo's 2016 Top Searched Celebrities, News Stories, Fashion Trends, and More
Western Digital Introduces Enterprise-Class HDDs and SSDs, 14TB SMR HDDs On The Way
HARMAN Invests in Navdy and Partners to Offer Aftermarket Augmented Reality Driving Device
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge R...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Judge Rejects Samsung's Demand For New Trial, Apple's Patent Award Demands


A court in California on Tuesday denied Samsung a retrial in a patent infringement dispute with Apple, and also declined to raise the damages earlier awarded to Apple.

The court also granted judgment as matter of law that Samsung's patent infringement was not willful - a finding that could have formed the basis to triple the damages owed by Samsung.

Last August, a jury decided that that the Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing design and utility patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury was untruthful and biased.

On Tuesday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, said the jury "had ample opportunity to compensate Apple for Samsung's use of its product designs." The jury awarded $382 million in damages for six products found to have diluted Apple's trade dress patents, but Apple filed for an additional $400 million. "Apple had not clearly shown that it was not adequately compensated for the losses it suffered due to Samsung's dilution of its trade dress in its products," Judge Koh wrote.

The Judge also denied Samsung's motion for judgement that none of Samsung's accused phones infringed Apple's design patents, and also denied Samsung's motion in the for a new trial.

The court also ruled against Samsung's claim that some Apple patents in the suit were invalid for indefiniteness, while granting an Apple plea that claims of a Samsung patent were invalid.


Previous
Next
Smaller Apple TV In The Works        All News        Nintendo Wii U Fails To Boost The Company's Profits
Sony's Music Unlimited Service To Offer High-Quality Audio     General Computing News      LG Reports Revenue Decrease, Operating Profits For 2012

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Samsung in Smartphone Patent Suit
KAIST Sues Samsung, Qualcomm And Globalfoundries Over FinFET Patent Infringement
Samsung Offers Second Gear S2 Update
Apple Sent Letter NHTSA Asking About Autonomous Vehicle Guidelines
Apple Blames Battery For Random iPhone 6s Shutdowns
Researcher Bypasses The iOS Activation Lock
Samsung Gear S3 Features Lonely Planet's Travel App, Guides and New Watchfaces
Apple To Use Drones To Collect Maps Data, Progresses With Interior Mapping Project
Samsung Galaxy S8 To Feature Automatic Focus Function to Its Front Camera
New Report Suggests A Curved iPhone Is In The Works
Samsung Investors And Executives Meet to Discuss Company Overhaul
Samsung Dominates The Global Mobile DRAM Market

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2016 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .