Tuesday, January 16, 2018
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Maersk and IBM to Apply Blockchain to Improve Global Trade
Qualcomm Urges to Stockholders Reject Broadcom's Takeover Offer
Western Digital Delivers New G-Technology G-SPEED Shuttle Solutions to content Creators
Google Expands Global Cloud Infrastructure With New Regions and Subsea Cables
New Pioneer DDJ-1000 Controller Designed for rekordbox dj
Microsoft AI Can Read a Document and Answer Questions About it as Well as a Person
Fujitsu Releases New Enterprise Tablet and PC Models
Tencent Tries to Tackle Cheaters in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds Game
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge R...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Judge Rejects Samsung's Demand For New Trial, Apple's Patent Award Demands


A court in California on Tuesday denied Samsung a retrial in a patent infringement dispute with Apple, and also declined to raise the damages earlier awarded to Apple.

The court also granted judgment as matter of law that Samsung's patent infringement was not willful - a finding that could have formed the basis to triple the damages owed by Samsung.

Last August, a jury decided that that the Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing design and utility patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury was untruthful and biased.

On Tuesday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, said the jury "had ample opportunity to compensate Apple for Samsung's use of its product designs." The jury awarded $382 million in damages for six products found to have diluted Apple's trade dress patents, but Apple filed for an additional $400 million. "Apple had not clearly shown that it was not adequately compensated for the losses it suffered due to Samsung's dilution of its trade dress in its products," Judge Koh wrote.

The Judge also denied Samsung's motion for judgement that none of Samsung's accused phones infringed Apple's design patents, and also denied Samsung's motion in the for a new trial.

The court also ruled against Samsung's claim that some Apple patents in the suit were invalid for indefiniteness, while granting an Apple plea that claims of a Samsung patent were invalid.


Previous
Next
Smaller Apple TV In The Works        All News        Nintendo Wii U Fails To Boost The Company's Profits
Sony's Music Unlimited Service To Offer High-Quality Audio     General Computing News      LG Reports Revenue Decrease, Operating Profits For 2012

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
China Also Seeks Answers from Apple About slowing iPhones
Samsung SDI Unveils New Battery Products at Detroit Motor Show
Samsung Posts Lower-than-expected Fourth Quarter Results
Samsung Mobile Chief Cautious About a Foldable Phone Launch in 2018
HARMAN and Samsung Unveil Connectivity and Autonomous Driving Technology at CES 2018
Samsung Unveils "The Wall," a Modular MicroLED 146-inch TV
Samsung Introduces the New Notebook 7 Spin, Notebook 9 (2018) and Notebook 9 Pen
Apple Reports Record App Store Sales
Samsung Takes Over No. 1 Position in Global Semiconductor Market
TSMC Could Outpace Samsung in 7nm Volume Production This Year
Samsung Unveils Thunderbolt 3 QLED Curved Monitor at CES 2018
Samsung C-Lab to Reveal New Projects at CES 2018

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2018 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .