Thursday, May 24, 2018
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Lenovo's PC Sales Shows Signs of Life, Although Smartphones Sales Remain Low
Uber's Self-driving Recognized Pedestrian Late and Failed to Brake: NTSB
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 Mobile Platform Brings Artificial Intelligence Features to a New Tier of Smartphones
Intel Nervana NNP-L1000 Neural Network Processor Coming in 2019
Uber Ends Arizona Self-driving Program
Apple to Offer $50 Rebates for iPhone Battery Swaps
Qualcomm Snapdragon XR1 SoC to be Dedicated to VR and AR Headsets
Next@Acer: Acer Debuts Premium Chromebooks, Gaming Desktops and Notebooks
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Judge R...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Judge Rejects Samsung's Demand For New Trial, Apple's Patent Award Demands


A court in California on Tuesday denied Samsung a retrial in a patent infringement dispute with Apple, and also declined to raise the damages earlier awarded to Apple.

The court also granted judgment as matter of law that Samsung's patent infringement was not willful - a finding that could have formed the basis to triple the damages owed by Samsung.

Last August, a jury decided that that the Samsung must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing design and utility patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury was untruthful and biased.

On Tuesday, Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, said the jury "had ample opportunity to compensate Apple for Samsung's use of its product designs." The jury awarded $382 million in damages for six products found to have diluted Apple's trade dress patents, but Apple filed for an additional $400 million. "Apple had not clearly shown that it was not adequately compensated for the losses it suffered due to Samsung's dilution of its trade dress in its products," Judge Koh wrote.

The Judge also denied Samsung's motion for judgement that none of Samsung's accused phones infringed Apple's design patents, and also denied Samsung's motion in the for a new trial.

The court also ruled against Samsung's claim that some Apple patents in the suit were invalid for indefiniteness, while granting an Apple plea that claims of a Samsung patent were invalid.


Previous
Next
Smaller Apple TV In The Works        All News        Nintendo Wii U Fails To Boost The Company's Profits
Sony's Music Unlimited Service To Offer High-Quality Audio     General Computing News      LG Reports Revenue Decrease, Operating Profits For 2012

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Apple to Offer $50 Rebates for iPhone Battery Swaps
Samsung Display Showcases Future Display Technologies SID 2018
Next Generation A12 iPhone Chips Are Already in production On TSMC's 7nm Process
Samsung Details Foundry Plans, 3nm Gate-All-Around FETs Coming in 2021
Samsung Opens Global AI Centers in the U.K., Canada and Russia
Samsung Brings Bixby to Home Appliances
Samsung Extends its Semiconductor Sales Lead over Intel
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Said to Launch Before September
Apple CEO Says Apple Music Hits 50 Million Subscribers
Samsung in Talks with ZTE to Offer Exynos Mobile Processor
Motorola and Microsoft Foldable Phone Patents, and the new Samsung Galaxy S8 Lite
Apple Will Not Build $1 billion Data Center in Ireland

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2018 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .