Monday, September 22, 2014
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
PlayStation TV Coming October 14th
Samsung Galaxy Alpha And LG G3 Vigor Coming from AT&T
EMC In Merger Talks With Other Companies: reports
HTC To Make Next Google Nexus tablet: report
MediaTek Unveils LinkIt Platform to Support Wearable and IoT Device Creation
Apple iPhone Sales Top 10 Million
VESA Puts DisplayPort Into New USB Type-C Connector
Corsair Unleashes Gaming RGB Keyboards, RGB Mice, and Headsets
Active Discussions
Yamaha CRW-F1UX
help questions structure DVDR
Made video, won't play back easily
Questions durability monitor LCD
Questions fungus CD/DVD Media, Some expert engineer in optical media can help me?
CD, DVD and Blu-ray burning for Android in development
IBM supercharges Power servers with graphics chips
Werner Vogels: four cloud computing trends for 2014
 Home > News > Mobiles > Has Int...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Friday, July 12, 2013
Has Intel Really Beaten ARM?


EE Times member Jim McGregor debunked a recent ABI Research report claiming that AnTuTu benchmark results and a recent ABI Research report claiming, "Intel apps processor outperforms Nvidia, Qualcomm, and Samsung."

New AnTuTu benchmark results and a recent ABI Research report claim that Intel surpassed the entire ARM ecosystem in mobile processors for the high-end smartphone segment.

In response to the report, EE Times member Jim McGregor investigated further and compiled a variety of benchmark information from tech reviewers, benchmarking organizations and other industry resources. In particular, he looked at processors from Samsung, Intel and Qualcomm and, in effect, debunked the entire report, showing that ARM-based processors came out on top. At the same time, he pointed to the nuances and traps of processor benchmarking in general.

"Evaluating current mobile processors is challenging because these processors, known as systems-on-chips (SoCs), are complex systems of heterogeneous processing elements combined with memory, I/O, high-speed networks, communications modems and a host of other dedicated system functions," a forum user wrote.

"Integration of the processors into mobile devices further complicates any evaluation because the overall performance and efficiency of these processors is impacted by the other system components. As a result, the industry turns to benchmarks to compare processors and devices. Unfortunately, mobile benchmarks are plagued by many issues and also fall short of providing an accurate evaluation."

Despite what seemed a fairly comprehensive conclusion, the EE Times community took McGregor's analysis, and benchmarking in general, to task, with an emphasis on power consumption:

"...this analysis kinda sidestep[s] the issue of power consumption. It was not the processor's computational speed that was in question. It was that Intel CPU had more or less the same performance at HALF the current drain/power."

"Well, long calls affecting battery life is much more a function of the RF chipset efficiency and software control of transmit levels, etc. I don't see how it would fit into a comparison of digital SoCs."

"Also, what OS was running on each platform to carry out these tests, since a highly optimized OS can make these benchmark tests show amazing performance on a slow processor vs. poor results on a badly ported OS running on a considerably faster processor."

"The ABI article is clearly more about the current draw than about raw performance. So, while I agree that they could have done a better job by averaging multiple benchmarks, I think the point of the article is that Intel seems to have finally conquered what analysts have considered its 'Achilles' heel': power consumption."

"The RAM scores seem highly unusual. Is there some kind of "cheating" going on with AnTuTu?"

On the topic of compilers:

"What's wrong with Intel getting ahead using better compiler technology?"

"Nothing, if we're talking about making real applications run faster. But that's not what we're talking about here.

What we're talking about here is the compiler removing portions of the benchmark, contrary to the intent of the benchmark. As a result, the benchmark results become meaningless."

The discussion continues to heat up. Clearly, all benchmarks should be questioned and none used exclusively; and recent headlines were more sensational than truthful.


Previous
Next
Apple Also Looks At Globalfoundries To Ensure Chip Capacity Flow        All News        Microsoft Cuts Prices Of Surface RT In Japan
Microsoft Sues U.S. Customs For Not Enforcing Google Phone Ban     Mobiles News      Windows Phone 8 GDR2 Update Brings New Features

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Latest Intel LTE Chipset Certified on China Mobile
Intel Offers Developers Software Tools, Outlines PC Evolution Across New Form Factors
Intel Unveils New Developer Tools, Future Technologies Tablets, Analytics, Wearable Devices and PCs at IDF 2014
New Intel Xeon E5-2600 v3 Processors Released
Intel Turns To Fashionable Wearables With Collaboration With Fossil Group
New Intel Core M Processor Coming In Tablets, Hybrids
Harman At IFA 2014
Latest Intel Graphics Driver Update Boosts Performance
Opening Ceremony and Intel Reveal MICA Accessory
Intel Hopes To Improve Its Mobile Business With Ex-Qualcomm exec
Intel Unleashes its First 8-Core Desktop Processor For Gaming
Intel Introduces World's Smallest Standalone 3G Modem

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2014 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .