Wednesday, May 24, 2017
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Samsung Gear 360 Availabile In-Stores For $230
Garmin VIRB 360 is a 5.7K waterproof 360-cam
Panasonic HIT Solar Module Achieved World's Highest Output Temperature Coefficient
Acer Curved 35-inch QHD Predator Z35P Monitor Now Available
SoftBank Reportedly Takes $4 Billion Stake in Nvidia
Silver Lake Invests $400 Million in Unity
LG Electronics to Finally Launch LG Pay in June
Moderate GPU Sales in the First Quarter
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Google ...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Friday, September 27, 2013
Google To Face Suit Over Scanning of Messages in Gmail


A federal judge in San Jose, CA., today rejected Google's claims that wiretapping laws do not apply to its Gmail business and that Google must face a lawsuit for illegally opening and reading the contents of email sent through its Gmail service.

In rejecting all but two of the Internet giant?s motions to dismiss a class action suit, Judge Lucy Koh ruled that reading emails is not a necessary part of Google's business operations and that California's Invasion of Privacy Laws apply to opening and reading online communications without consent.

"Google's alleged interceptions are neither instrumental to the provision of email services, nor are they an incidental effect of providing these services. The Court therefore finds that Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that the interceptions fall outside Google's ordinary course of business," wrote Judge Koh.

Judge Koh also found that the Google's Terms of Service and Privacy Polices did not inform users about the Gmail interceptions. She wrote:

"The Court finds, however, that those policies did not explicitly notify Plaintiffs that Google would intercept users' emails for the purposes of creating user profiles or providing targeted advertising ...

"The Court therefore finds that a reasonable Gmail user who read the Privacy Policies would not have necessarily understood that her emails were being intercepted to create user profiles or to provide targeted advertisements. Accordingly, the Court finds that it cannot conclude at this phase that the new policies demonstrate that Gmail user Plaintiffs consented to the interceptions."

Judge Koh gave the plaintiffs permission to amend and re-file the two claims she dismissed.

Google says it automatically scans emails to target advertising based on words that appear in Gmail messages but says that machines, not people, do the scanning.

"We're disappointed in this decision and are considering our options," Google said. "Automated scanning lets us provide Gmail users with security and spam protection, as well as great features."


Previous
Next
Intel Web-TV Service Plans Changed        All News        Intel Invests In Google Glass Rival
Intel Web-TV Service Plans Changed     General Computing News      Intel Invests In Google Glass Rival

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Google To Employ Machine Learning To Ad Analytics
Google Dedicates Second Day of Google I/O on Daydream, Tango, and Developer tools for VR and AR
Google I/O: Google Digital Assistant Coming to iPhone, Android O, Android Go, New TPU and VR
Google to Bring Digital Assistant To Third-party Hardware, Including the iPhone
Google Becomes More Flexible When it Comes to Banning Adsense Publishers
New Google Pixel Phone Could By Made By LG
Google Buys Successful VR Game Studio Owlchemy Labs
Google Tightens OAuth Rules to Block Phishing
Google to Pay $334 million to Settle Italy Tax Dispute
Google Tweaks Web Ranking algorithm To Tackle Fake News
This Is Google's Next Generation Of Jump VR Camera, Meet YI HALO
Google Home Now Recognizes Different Speakers

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2017 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .