Sunday, April 19, 2015
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Moore's Law And The Software Industry
Adobe And Windows Zero-Day Exploits Likely Leveraged by Russians In Highly-Targeted Attack
Samsung Logo Removed From Japanese Smartphones
Google Is Getting Serious With Project Loon
New Technology Can Track Detailed Hand Motion
Office Universal apps Coming Next Month On Windows 10 for Phones
FCC Makes 150 MHz Of Contiguous Spectrum Available To Telecom Companies
Google Extends Chrome Support For Windows XP
Active Discussions
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
Question about nero
Copied dvd's say blank in computer only
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
Need serious help!!!!
burning
 Home > News > General Computing > Google ...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Friday, September 27, 2013
Google To Face Suit Over Scanning of Messages in Gmail


A federal judge in San Jose, CA., today rejected Google's claims that wiretapping laws do not apply to its Gmail business and that Google must face a lawsuit for illegally opening and reading the contents of email sent through its Gmail service.

In rejecting all but two of the Internet giant?s motions to dismiss a class action suit, Judge Lucy Koh ruled that reading emails is not a necessary part of Google's business operations and that California's Invasion of Privacy Laws apply to opening and reading online communications without consent.

"Google's alleged interceptions are neither instrumental to the provision of email services, nor are they an incidental effect of providing these services. The Court therefore finds that Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that the interceptions fall outside Google's ordinary course of business," wrote Judge Koh.

Judge Koh also found that the Google's Terms of Service and Privacy Polices did not inform users about the Gmail interceptions. She wrote:

"The Court finds, however, that those policies did not explicitly notify Plaintiffs that Google would intercept users' emails for the purposes of creating user profiles or providing targeted advertising ...

"The Court therefore finds that a reasonable Gmail user who read the Privacy Policies would not have necessarily understood that her emails were being intercepted to create user profiles or to provide targeted advertisements. Accordingly, the Court finds that it cannot conclude at this phase that the new policies demonstrate that Gmail user Plaintiffs consented to the interceptions."

Judge Koh gave the plaintiffs permission to amend and re-file the two claims she dismissed.

Google says it automatically scans emails to target advertising based on words that appear in Gmail messages but says that machines, not people, do the scanning.

"We're disappointed in this decision and are considering our options," Google said. "Automated scanning lets us provide Gmail users with security and spam protection, as well as great features."


Previous
Next
Intel Web-TV Service Plans Changed        All News        Intel Invests In Google Glass Rival
Intel Web-TV Service Plans Changed     General Computing News      Intel Invests In Google Glass Rival

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Europe Charges Google In Antitrust Case
Google is Working on Battery Technology
Google Plans YouTube Subscription Service
Child and Consumer Advocates Urge Federal Trade Commission to Investigate Google for Deceptive Advertising Directed at Children
China Internet Authority Slams Google Over Certificate Rejection
European Regulators To File Antitrust Charges Against Google
Google To Use SSDs From Samsung: report
Google Now Offers A Gmail For Android Users
Google To Get Into The Operating Room
Google Defeated in English Court - Decision Opens Door for Litigation by Millions of British Apple Users
Google To Show Targetted Ads To Fiber TV Customers
Consumer Watchdog Calls On FTC To Re-Open Its Google Investigation

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2015 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .