Tuesday, January 24, 2017
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
Sprint is Buying Stake in Tidal
Xiaomi's Global Vice President Hugo Barra is Leaving the Company
Samsung Announces Cause of Galaxy Note7 Incidents, Shares Quality Assurance Measures
Hon Hai chief Mulls US$7 Billion Display Panel Investment in U.S.
Apple Sues Qualcomm Over Patent Royalties
Sharp Establishes New Research and Development Center for Home Appliances in China
Samsung Seeks Arbitration Over LCD Supply Halt
Canon May Invest In Toshiba's Chip Business
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Yahoo M...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Wednesday, October 05, 2016
Yahoo Makes Headlines With Massive Email Surveillance Project


Reuters is reporting that, in 2015, Yahoo complied with an order it received from the U.S. government to search all of its users’ incoming emails, in real time.

If the report is accurate, it represents a new expansion of the U.S. government’s mass surveillance techniques.

In a carefully worded statement that stops short of a denial, Yahoo said a Tuesday Reuters report is "misleading," saying that "the mail scanning described in the article does not exist on our systems." Yahoo added that it complies with U.S. law and that it interprets every government request for data "narrowly" to "minimize disclosure."

This isn’t the first time the U.S. government has been conducting unconstitutional mass surveillance of Internet communications in real time. The NSA’s Upstream surveillance program - the program at the heart of our ongoing lawsuit Jewel v. NSA - bears some resemblance to the surveillance technique described in the Reuters report. In both cases, the government compels providers to scan the contents of communications as they pass through the providers’ networks, searching the full contents of the communications for targeted "selectors," such as email addresses, phone numbers, or malware "cybersignatures."

Mass surveillance of Yahoo’s emails is unconstitutional for the same reasons that it'sunconstitutional for the government to copy and search through vast amounts of communications passing through AT&T’s network as part of Upstream. The warrantless surveillance of millions of Yahoo users’ communications described in the Reuters story flies in the face of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches. Surveillance like this is an example of "general warrants" that the Fourth Amendment was directly intended to prevent.

While illegal mass surveillance is familiar, the Yahoo surveillance program represents some deeply troubling new twists.

First, this is the first public indication that the government has compelled a U.S.-based email provider-as opposed to an Internet-backbone provider-to conduct surveillance against all its customers in real time. In attempting to justify its warrantless surveillance under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act-including Upstream and PRISM-the government has claimed that these programs only "target" foreigners outside the U.S. and thus do not implicate American citizens’ constitutional rights. Here, however, the government seems to have dispensed with that dubious facade by intentionally engaging in mass surveillance of purely domestic communications involving millions of Yahoo users.

Second, the story explains that Yahoo had to build new capabilities to comply with the government’s demands, and that new code may have, itself, opened up new security vulnerabilities for Yahoo and its users. We read about new data breaches and attempts to compromise the security of Internet-connected systems on a seemingly daily basis. Yet this story is another example of how the government continues to take actions that have serious potential for collateral effects on everyday users.

The question is whether Yahoo the only company to be compelled to engage in this sort of mass surveillance.

Google, whose Gmail is the world's largest email service, said Tuesday that it hadn't received a similar spying request from the request from the U.S. government.

Twitter, which allows users to exchange direct messages, likewise said it has never received such a request and would challenge it in court if it did. Facebook said it would "fight" such a request should it ever receive one.



Previous
Next
Micron Posts Yearly Revenue Decline, But Forecast Profit        All News        Rivals Honda And Yamaha Motor Set To Announce Partnership
Micron Posts Yearly Revenue Decline, But Forecast Profit     General Computing News      Rivals Honda And Yamaha Motor Set To Announce Partnership

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
Yahoo To be Named Altaba, Mayer to Depart Following Verizon Deal
Yahoo Unveils New Security Breach
Yahoo's 2016 Top Searched Celebrities, News Stories, Fashion Trends, and More
Yahoo Investigates New Hack Claim
EU Privacy Authorities Warn WhatsApp on Data Privacy Policy, Yahoo on Breach
Yahoo Asks U.S. Intelligence Authorities To Explain Email Scanning Order
Yahoo Reports Profit For Third Quarter 2016
Verizon Says Yahoo Breach Affecting Acquisition
Security Firm Claims Yahoo Hack Was Not State-sponsored
Yahoo Says 'state-sponsored' Hack Affected More Than 500 Million Accounts
Yahoo Is The New Home For Free Hulu
Verizon Buys Yahoo's Core Business For $4.83 billion

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2017 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .