1. Introduction
ASUS CRW2410S
vs. WAITEC MEGALUS - Page
1
- Introduction
ASUS
and WAITEC did not stay out of CD-RW recording at 24X. ASUS presents the CRW
2410S and WAITEC the MEGALUS model. The drives come to join the already widely
supported 24X market by TDK, Sanyo, Plextor, Lite-on. Since the recording time
of 24X "Z-CLV" recording technology is "established" in
approximately 4 min, our interest is focus to those specific details that can
make the difference to any of the tested models. A look at the testing results
will give an answer to all of our questions...
- Features
Both
ASUS CRW-2410S and WAITEC MEGALUS support 24x writing, 10x re-writing and 40x
reading speeds. With 24x writing speed you can have a full 74min CD under 4mins!
That is the fastest current recording speed you can get, but for getting that
level of performance you will have to use very good quality media! The drive
is also equipped with "BURN-Proof" technology also supports: "Zone-CLV"
recording mode and "FlexSS-BP" quality control mechanism. Read more
about those 2 technologies over here.
- The packages
The
package supplied for ASUS CRW-2410S v6h35 was the retail version. This included:
The drive itself, a user's manual, a Ricoh 24x CD-R blank, an ASUS High-Speed
RW Blank, Audio cables, mounting screws and an IDE cable. The software supplied
with the drive was Nero Burning ROM v5.5.3.5. The drive updated with newer 6.36
firmware for all recording/reading tests.
The
WAITEC Megalus package included a user's manual in a CD-ROM, a WAITEC 24x CD-R
blank, a WAITEC High-Speed RW Blank, Audio cables, mounting screws and an IDE
cable. The software supplied with the drive was Prassi PrimcoCD 2.0. The specific
software version is can be updated to Prassi Primco Plus 2 for Megalus, using
another supplied CD-ROM. Also in the package there was a CD-ROM contained a
collection of pictures of various WAITEC's products.
On the front of both drives there are two leds, the headphone jack, the volume
control, and the eject button. Both models have the "BP Rec" logo.
The back of both drives is similar. We find the usual connectors (IDE interface,
power), the jumpers for setting the drive as Master/Slave and the SPDIF (analog/digital)
output connectors. As you can see there are also some slots used for extra cooling
but the drives are not equipped with any cooling fan.
- Installation
Both drives were installed as Master in the secondary IDE BUS (separately
tested). They worked in PIO MODE-4 mode and after booting they were identified
as "ASUS CRW-2410S" and "WAITEC MEGALUS",
respectively. We unchecked the Auto Insert notification, checked DMA and rebooted.
- Test Machine
WinMe OS
Soyo 7VCA
Celeron II 566 over clocked to 850 MHz
128MB SDRAM PC 133
WD 18GB UDMA 66
Quantum Fireball EX 6.4 GB UDMA 33
DAWI 2975 - PCI (ULTRA) SCSI Host Adapter
ATI AIW 128
ASUS CRW 2410S firmware v6.36
WAITEC MEGALUS firmware v6.34
TEAC CD-W524E firmware v1.0A
PleXWriter PX-W2410A firmware v1.02
2. Data Tests
ASUS
CRW2410S vs. Waitec MEGALUS - Page
2
Data Tests
- Test Method
* SCSI Mechanic v3.0x: This was used to compare the drive's I/O performance
against other various CDR-W drives (see charts). We used a pressed CD containing
PlexTools v1.08 for all tests.
* Nero CD Speed v0.84b was also used to check the drive's performance
with pressed CDs. For that test, we also used the PlexTools v1.08 pressed CD.
- SCSI Mechanic v3.0x results
Both ASUS and WAITEC drives have similar performance as was expected. The
ASUS CRW2410S seems slightly faster than WAITEC MEGALUS , possibly due to the
newer firmware revision. Both drives are faster than TEAC CD-W524E but slower
than PleXWriter PX-W2410A.
- Nero CD Speed v0.84 results
The Nero CD Speed results confirmed our previous tests results. In this test,
both ASUS CRW2410S and WAITEC MEGALUS had the exact same performance. The TEAC
CD-W524E stays behind and the PleXWriter PX-W2410A holds the first place.
The seek times of ASUS and WAITEC drives should be considered rather high
compared to the TEAC CD-W524E, which has the lowest in the industry. Both drives
have around 125ms performance. The PleXWriter needs improvement in this particular
test to reach the competition.
- PSX Pressed Media
For this test we used the PSX game 'NBA Jam Extreme' and we ripped the image
to HD with CloneCD. We measured the reading time of the ASUS CRW2410S and WAITEC
MEGALUS. Both drives need 273ses to end the task when the PleXWriter PX-W2410A
does the same task at only 54secs. Only the TEAC CD-W524E is slower with 330secs:
- CDR Media
The ASUS and WAITEC MEGALUS drives improved their reading performance with
CDR media. Both drives have 31.19X average reading speed, which is again faster
than TEAC CD-W524E but slower than PleXWriter PX-W2410A.
3. RW reading tests
ASUS
CRW2410S vs. Waitec MEGALUS -
Page 3
RW reading tests
- Nero CD Speed v0.84 Results
For the RW tests we used the Ricoh's HS-RW media written at 10x speed. The
WAITEC MEGALUS had a very good reading performance, while ASUS CRW2410S showed
some reading problems with the test disc, lowering the average reading speed:
CloneCD Reading
Tests
- Procedure:
We used CloneCD (v3.1.1.0) and 5 original CDs - Euro 2000 (SafeDisc 1),
No One Lives For Ever (SafeDisc 2), Rally Masters (LaserLock 1), Desperados
(LaserLock 2) and V-Rally 2 Expert (SecuROM 2) - in order to test the reading
performance of the tested drives. We also tested the reading performance with
backups of the original CDs, since the reading speed varies between original
and backup media. For comparison reasons we added the results of the already
tested TEAC CD-W524E and PleXWriter PX-W2410A. The following picture shows both
ASUS/WAITEC reading/writing capabilities:
- SafeDisc 1/2 Results
The ASUS CRW2410S and WAITEC MEGALUS have the worst reading performance compared
to the TEAC and Plextor drives. Both drive needs around 50mins to finish the
task while PleXWriter PX-W2410A needs only 2mins.
With SafeDisc2 protected CDs the performance is slight better
but still worse than PleXWriter's.
- LaserLock 1/2 Results
With LaserLock 1 protected CDs, the ASUS/WAITEC drives needs around 48mins
to end the task.
The LaserLock 2 protected CDs are very hard for all recorders to read. Both
ASUS/WAITEC need over one hour (1:21:33h) to end the task with the original
and only 21mins with the backup CD.
- SecuROM Results
Both ASUS/WAITEC can support reading of SubChannel from Data/Audio Tracks.
The reading performance is very good both with the original/backup CDs.
4. DAE Tests
ASUS
CRW2410S vs. Waitec MEGALUS
- Page 4
DAE Tests
- Test Method
We used CD DAE 99 v0.21 beta and EAC v0.9 prebeta 11 software in order to
check the DAE performance of both drives with various AudioCDs (both pressed
and CDR). The posted DAE results are the average of both applications, but the
CPU usage was only taken from CD DAE 99, since EAC occupies the system a lot
more. As a last note, we used the "BURST" reading mode of EAC. We
made a full CD Rip starting from the first to the last track of the CD. The
Average DAE reported speed along with the CPU Usage is displayed in the test
graphs.
- DAE features
We
used EAC v0.9 prebeta 11 to examine the drive's features. As the program reported,
the drives doesn't "Caching" data, supports "Accurate Stream"
and doesn't include "C2" error info. All 4 tested drives supports
up to 40x (CAV) DAE speed.
- Pressed AudioCD results
The ASUS and WAITEC drives have similar performance. The average DAE ripping
speed is around 29X making the drive faster than TEAC CD-W524E but slower than
the PleXWriter PX-W2410A:
- CDR AudioCD results
The DAE performance with CDR media is the same as with pressed CDs. The average
DAE performance is 28.8X while the TEAC CD-W524E has 29.3X and PleXWriter PX-W2410A
30X:
- EAC Secure Extract Ripping mode
After many requests from numerous visitors we have added the EAC's secure
extract ripping mode results, which ensures maximum produced WAV quality. Note
that for each drive we used the build-in detection function:
Tested Drives
|
Average DAE Speed (X)
|
Pressed
|
CDR
|
TEAC CD-W524E
|
5.6
|
4.5
|
PleXWriter PX-W2410A
|
8.7
|
9.6
|
ASUS CRW2410S
|
11.7
|
11.3
|
WAITEC MEGALUS
|
11.5
|
11.6
|
- Advanced DAE Quality
Both ASUS/WAITEC drives get a 100 score (best) in the Nero CD Speed Advanced
DAE test. The drive's average reading speed was 29.13x (ASUS) and 29.5x (WAITEC)
and no errors were produced.
- Bad CDR Media results
Despite the fact that CD Speed 99 Advanced DAE test stretches drive's mechanism
to the max, we decided to do real life tests with a scratched disc. The disc
was dirty, and with some light scratches, enough in order cause problems to
most of the tested drives. We used CD DAE 99 software to rip the whole disc
(756539616 sectors) and the results were very interesting:
|
Average Speed (X)
|
Errors
|
Errors Of Total Disc (%)
|
PleXWriter PX-W2410A
|
27.7
|
2946403
|
0.39
|
TEAC CD-W524E
|
26.5
|
1
|
0.00
|
ASUS CRW2410S
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
WAITEC MEGALUS
|
13
|
3500
|
0.00
|
The WAITEC MEGALUS performed well with our test disc but the ASUS CRW2410S
aborted reading after 5th track. The TEAC CD-W524E has a superb performance
with only one error and the PleXWriter PX-W2410A needs further improvement to
reach the top.
- Ripping 90 and 99mins AudioCDs
Both drives recognized 90min AudioCDs without any problems; however they had
problems with 99min CDs.
5. CDR Tests
ASUS
CRW2410S vs. Waitec MEGALUS -
Page 5
CDR Tests
Both ASUS and WAITEC drives use Z-CLV for achieving 24x-writing speed. Below
is a graph that represents the main differences of ASUS's implementation of
Z-CLV writing technology compared to the fastest 24x Z-CLV recorder from Plextor.
The graphs show the 24x writing speed for ASUS CRW2410A among with the second
24x writing speed strategy that applies for lower quality media:
ASUS CRW2410S starts writing at 16x (0 mins), shifts to 20x at 6mins, shifts
again up to 24x at 16mins and writes at 24x till the end of the disc. The ASUS
drive has the same exact shift points with the PleXWriter PX-W2410A only when
Ricoh's 74/80min 24x certified CDs are used.
When other media ,such as Taiyo Yuden/Mitsubishi Chemicals are used, a second
writing strategy is applied. Now the drive writes at 16x till 15mins, shifts
up to 20x at 18mins and up to 24x at 30mins. In that case the average writing
speed, according to the Nero CD Speed is only 21.55X. Even ASUS tweak will be
appreciated by the average user, it needs improvement since the drive doesn't
recognize other media except from Ricoh 24x, which can be written at 24x speed.
In the following table we can see the average writing speed of the TEAC CD-W524E,
PleXWriter PX-W2410A and ASUS CRW2410S:
CDR-W drives
|
Average Writing Speed with 80min CD
(X)
|
TEAC CD-W524E
|
22.55
|
PleXWriter PX-W2410A
|
22.77
|
ASUS CRW2410S
|
22.77
|
ASUS CRW2410S*
|
21.55
|
The ASUS CRW2410S has the exact same rotation speeds as the PleXWriter PX-W2410A
at the normal 24x writing mode. As the second 24x writing strategy is followed.
the drive barely reaches 7000rpm during the entire CD.
- Procedure
We tested the ASUS/WAITEC drives with Nero v5.5.5.6, Ahead InCD v3.12b, CloneCD
v3.1.1.0 and, Padus DJ v3.50.799 software. We used various of media for performing
our tests: Mitsubishi Chemicals 74/80min 24x certified, Mitsui 74min 24x certified,
Taiyo Yuden 74/80min 24x certified, Ricoh 74min 24x certified and Ricoh's 74min
HS-RW. Both drives include FlexSS-BP system for reducing writing speed when
low quality media are used.
- 74min CD-R Tests
We created a "DataCD" job with data slightly more than 74mins (74:03:65).
We burned the same job with all 4 CDR-W drives:
Both ASUS/WAITEC drives need the exact same time (318secs) to end the task,
which are 7 sacs higher from Teac's CD-W524E performance. The PleXWriter PX-W2410A
needs 313secs and keeps close to the top.
At the maximum writing speed, the ASUS CRW2410S seems to perform better than
the WAITEC MEGALUS. The newer firmware revision can explain these performance
issues. The lower recording time is achieved with Ricoh's 74min 24x certified
media. When other media are used, the ASUS drive is slower than the TEAC CD-W524E
by 4-5secs.
- 80min CD-R Tests
In our normal burning tests the 80min CD contains slightly more than 80min
data (80:01:47):
Again both ASUS/WAITEC drives are slower than TEAC CD-W524E.
The ASUS CRW2410S is not performing very well with 80mins. The drive seems
13secs slower than TEAC CD-W524E! The WAITEC MEGALUS doesn't seem to be faster
than ASUS and needs 261secs to end the task.
- Overburning Tests
After using Nero CD Speed we saw that both drives can overburn up to 93:44
mins.
- CD-Text Results
We created several AudioCDs with CD-Text enabled. Both drives can read/write
CD-Text AudioCDs without any problems.
- CloneCD Writing Tests
The
CloneCD v3.1.1.0 reports that both drives supports the DAO-RAW feature. We performed
our usual tests and we confirmed that the drive supports fully the DAO-RAW writing
mode (Safedisc 1.0, LaserLock 1/2 and SecuROM 2). Note that the ASUS CRW2410S
,with 6.36 firmware, supports up to 24x writing speed at DAO-RAW mode, while
the WAITEC MEGALUS only 16x.
- SD2 Support
For the SD2 test we used the "No One Lives For Ever", "Max
Payne" and "Emperor Battle of Dune" game titles. We used both
drives as readers/writers. The produced backups didn't work using the same or
any drive we tested with. Therefore, both ASUS CRW2410S/WAITEC MEGALUS cannot
produce SD2 working backups.
- 8cm mini CDs
Both ASUS and WAITEC drives, support reading/writing of 8cm CDs.
- Buffer Underrun tests
Both drives support the "BURN-Proof" anti-coaster technology. The
drives worked perfectly under all heavy duty cycle attacks attempted by us,
and will continue writing even you press ctrl+alt+del.
6. Writing Quality Tests
ASUS
CRW2410S vs. Waitec MEGALUS -
Page 6
Writing Quality Tests
We used Ricoh's 74min 24x CD-R media. All CDs were burned at 24x writing speed
for each drive with Nero 5.5.5.6 and were Audio CDs with 74:51:27 in size. The
produced CDs, were measured from DigitalDrives
and results are illustrated in the following tables:
Ricoh 74min 24x media
|
Model
|
C1
|
Average Burning Time (secs)
|
Max
|
Average
|
Yamaha CRW3200E (OWC on)
|
17
|
0.9
|
227
|
Yamaha CRW3200E (OWC off)
|
20
|
0.8
|
LiteOn LTR-24102B
|
28
|
3.8
|
252
|
AOpen CRW2440 (JustSpeed on)
|
22
|
1.3
|
247
|
AOpen CRW2440 (JustSpeed off)
|
40
|
1.5
|
246
|
Plextor PX-W2410A
|
14
|
0.5
|
234
|
TEAC CD-W524E
|
41
|
1.0
|
237
|
Mitsumi CR-4809TE
|
14
|
0.5
|
242
|
ASUS CRW2410S
|
21
|
0.9
|
236
|
The ASUS CRW2410S performed very well, when Ricoh's 74min 24x certified media
were used. The average C1 error rate is 0.9 and the average burning time is
236secs, very close to the PleXWriter PX-W2410A. The following graph comes from
the Ricoh 74min (24x) media:
The ASUS CRW2410S general writing quality was very good and the only part
of the chart where the C1 error rate is high is at 5-7mins, where the shifting
from 16x to 20x takes place.
- More Writing Quality Results
Mitsui 74min 24x media
|
Model
|
C1
|
Average Burning Time (secs)
|
Max
|
Average
|
Yamaha CRW3200E (OWC on)
|
20
|
0.7
|
227
|
Yamaha CRW3200E (OWC off)
|
17
|
0.7
|
LiteOn LTR-24102B
|
64
|
0.9
|
242
|
AOpen CRW2440 (JustSpeed on)
|
18
|
1.2
|
246
|
AOpen CRW2440 (JustSpeed off)
|
26
|
1.7
|
245
|
Plextor PX-W2410A
|
17
|
1.5
|
230
|
TEAC CD-W524E
|
17
|
0.8
|
237
|
Mitsumi CR-4809TE
|
21
|
1.3
|
242
|
ASUS CRW2410S
|
19
|
1.3
|
239
|
With Mitsui 74min 24x certified media, the ASUS CRW2410S showed an average
writing quality with only 1.3 C1 average error rate.
Taiyo Yuden 74min 24x
media
|
Model
|
C1
|
Average Burning Time (secs)
|
Max
|
Average
|
Yamaha CRW3200E (OWC on)
|
28
|
0.6
|
228
|
Yamaha CRW3200E (OWC off)
|
53
|
3.0
|
LiteOn LTR-24102B
|
7
|
0.2
|
246
|
AOpen CRW2440 (JustSpeed on)
|
10
|
0.5
|
253
|
AOpen CRW2440 (JustSpeed off)
|
11
|
0.5
|
249
|
Plextor PX-W2410A
|
9
|
0.6
|
232
|
TEAC CD-W524E
|
9
|
0.4
|
238
|
Mitsumi CR-4809TE
|
11
|
0.3
|
245
|
ASUS CRW2410S
|
11
|
0.2
|
253
|
With Taiyo Yuden 74min 24x certified media, the ASUS CRW2410S CR-4809TE has
very good performance with only 0.2 C1 error rate. However the burning time
is high enough.
Mitsubishi Chemicals
74min 24x media
|
Model
|
C1
|
Average Burning Time (secs)
|
Max
|
Average
|
Yamaha CRW3200E (OWC on)
|
12
|
2.1
|
259
|
Yamaha CRW3200E (OWC off)
|
12
|
2
|
225
|
LiteOn LTR-24102B
|
10
|
1.8
|
244
|
AOpen CRW2440 (JustSpeed on)
|
13
|
1.6
|
247
|
AOpen CRW2440 (JustSpeed off)
|
16
|
1.6
|
243
|
Plextor PX-W2410A
|
17
|
1.9
|
234
|
TEAC CD-W524E
|
15
|
1.8
|
236
|
Mitsumi CR-4809TE
|
21
|
2.0
|
242
|
ASUS CRW2410S
|
17
|
2.2
|
251
|
None of the tested drives seem to give a very good writing quality when Mitsubishi
Chemicals (Verbatim) 74min 24x certified media used. The ASUS CRW2410S has the
highest C1 error rate from the 24x Z-CLV recorders, while the average burning
time stays at the same level as with the other media.
Various Brands at 24x
media
|
Model
|
C1
|
Average Burning Time (secs)
|
Max
|
Average
|
Ritek 80min 24x
|
20
|
0.8
|
271
|
Taiyo Yuden 80min 24x
|
12
|
0.2
|
268
|
MitsuBishi Chemicals 80min 24x
|
19
|
4.6
|
271
|
Verbatim 80min 16x
|
33
|
4.4
|
269
|
Creation 80min 12x
|
26
|
5.2
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
TDK D-View 74min 12x
|
50
|
5.4
|
253
|
Mitsui 74min 16x
|
22
|
2.7
|
237
|
Verbatim 74min 16x
|
24
|
2.2
|
253
|
Creation 74min 16x
|
21
|
1.2
|
246
|
7. RW Writing Tests
ASUS
CRW2410S vs. Waitec MEGALUS -
Page 7
RW Writing Tests
We used Nero 5.5.5.6 for writing CDs in maximum RW writing speed for all the
tested drives. For our tests we used Ricoh's 10x HS-RW media:
The ASUS CRW2410S didn't perform very well with the Ricoh HS-RW media. The
drive needs 498secs, while the WAITEC only 492mins. The erase time of ASUS is
rather high (70secs) when the WAITEC needs exactly 60secs.
- Packet Writing
Tests
We used Ahead InCD v3.12b for the Packet Writing tests. We used TDK HS-RW
media and we formatted it. The formatted disc revealed 530mbs of free space.
We copied a 403 MB file (403.147 kbs) from a Hard Disk (on the same PC as the
writers) to the formatted RW media-using explorer (we dragged and dropped) and
we completed the test twice to eliminate possible time measurement faults and
user errors:
The ASUS CRW-2410S performed very well and its writing (7.20X)/reading (7.18X)
performance is at the same levels as the competition offers. The WAITEC MEGALUS
is slightly slower (7.15X/7.0X). The PleXWriter PX-W2410A is the faster drive
at this test.
8. Conclusion
ASUS
CRW2410S vs. Waitec MEGALUS
- Page 8
Conclusion
Positive (+)
|
Negative (-)
|
-Support 24x (Z-CLV) writing speed
-"BURN-Proof" anti-coaster technology
-"FlexSS-BP" quality protection system
-Very Good data reading performance with pressed/cdr media
-Good Seek times
-Good DAE ripping performance
-Good DAE ripping quality
-Good packet writing performance
-Supports HS-RW standard (10x re-write)
-Supports DAO-RAW
-Supports reading of SubChannel data
-Supports CD-Text (read/write)
-Supports Overburning (up to 93minutes)
|
- Writing times are higher than competition
- Failed to recognize written 99min CDs
- Very bad CloneCD reading performance
- Failed to backup SD2 protected CDs
- No UDMA-33 support
- Loud operation when reading
- Competition has lower price
|
Asus CRW-2410S and Waitec Megalus performed as expected. Both
drives did not manage to hide their Sanyo alike behavior and performed pretty
well among with the most of the tested CD-RW drives.
Getting into details about these drives we can say that their
overall performance is a very good and the only point that will disappoint the
user is the bad reading performance with protected CDs. We think that this should
be a high priority matter for the manufacturers when they will be working on
future improvements. On the other hand the drives do support reading of SubChannel
data (from both data/audio tracks) although they cannot make a working SD2 backup.
The writing times are higher than the competition and C1 error rates vary through
different media.
Both proposals face the strong competition from TEAC/Plextor/AOPEN/LITEON/Mitsumi
and Yamaha. The lack of several features will not please users who wish the
absolute maximum performance among with the lowest price. The possible buyer
should look carefully at the performance details and decide if he can get along
with the drive's limitations or not.