Sunday, February 19, 2017
Search
  
Submit your own News for
inclusion in our Site.
Click here...
Breaking News
New Samsung Galaxy Tab S Series To Include Windows Version
Researchers Introduce New Wireless Charging Technology
HTC Takes VR lead in China
SoftBank To Offload Sprint: report
New Mac OS X Malware Steal Passwords, And iPhone Backups
Xiaomi Launches a Smart GPS-Watch and A Smart Guitar
Alphabet Advances Its 'Loon' Baloon Internet Plan
Samsung Chief Arrested
Active Discussions
Which of these DVD media are the best, most durable?
How to back up a PS2 DL game
Copy a protected DVD?
roxio issues with xp pro
Help make DVDInfoPro better with dvdinfomantis!!!
menu making
Optiarc AD-7260S review
cdrw trouble
 Home > News > General Computing > Europea...
Last 7 Days News : SU MO TU WE TH FR SA All News

Friday, December 21, 2012
European Commission Accuses Samsung Of Misusing Mobile Phone Standard-essential Patents


The European Commission charged Samsung Electronics on Friday with abusing its dominant position in seeking to bar rival Apple from using a patent deemed essential to mobile phone use.

The European Commission (EC) has informed Samsung of its preliminary view that Samsung's seeking of injunctions against Apple in Europe on the basis of its mobile phone standard-essential patents ("SEPs") amounts to an abuse of a dominant position prohibited by EU antitrust rules.

While recourse to injunctions is a possible remedy for patent infringements, such conduct may be abusive where SEPs are concerned and the potential licensee is willing to negotiate a licence on Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (so-called "FRAND") terms.

Commission Vice President in charge of competition policy Joaquin Almunia said: "Intellectual property rights are an important cornerstone of the single market. However, such rights should not be misused when they are essential to implement industry standards, which bring huge benefits to businesses and consumers alike. When companies have contributed their patents to an industry standard and have made a commitment to license the patents in return for fair remuneration, then the use of injunctions against willing licensees can be anti-competitive."

Standards bodies generally require members to commit to license patents that they have declared essential for a standard on FRAND terms. This commitment is designed to ensure effective access to a standard for all market players and to prevent "hold-up" by a single SEP holder, since access to those patents which are standard-essential is a precondition for any company to sell interoperable products in the market. At the same time, it allows SEP holders to be fairly remunerated for their intellectual property.

The Samsung SEPs in question relate to the European Telecommunications Standardisation Institute's (ETSI) 3G UMTS standard, a key industry standard for mobile and wireless communications. When this standard was adopted in Europe, Samsung gave a commitment that it would license the patents which it had declared essential to the standard on FRAND terms. In 2011, Samsung started to seek injunctive relief before courts in various Member States against Apple based on claimed infringements of certain of its 3G UMTS SEPs.

Today's Statement of Objections sets out the Commission's preliminary view that under the specific circumstances of this case, where a commitment to license SEPs on FRAND terms has been given by Samsung, and where a potential licensee, in this case Apple, has shown itself to be willing to negotiate a FRAND licence for the SEPs, then recourse to injunctions harms competition. Since injunctions generally involve a prohibition of the product infringing the patent being sold, such recourse risks excluding products from the market without justification and may distort licensing negotiations unduly in the SEP-holder's favour.

Samsung said it was studying the Commission's statement. It said it would cooperate fully and "firmly defend ourselves against any misconceived allegations".

Samsung on December 18 announced of that it was withdrawing any injunctions in Europe. However, the EC said that Samsung's move did not alter its preliminary conclusions about the anti-competitive nature of Samsung's conduct thus far.

European antitrust watchdogs opened the investigation in January 2012.

A Statement of Objections is a formal step in EC's investigations. The EC informs the parties concerned in writing of the objections raised against them and the parties can reply in writing and request an oral hearing to present comments.

The EC takes a final decision only after the parties have exercised their rights of defence.

If, after the parties have exercised their right of defence, the EC concludes that there is sufficient evidence of an infringement, it can issue a decision prohibiting the conduct and impose a fine of up to 10 % of a company's annual worldwide turnover.


Previous
Next
AsusTek Downplays Intel's Rumored Switch On Non-socketed CPU Designs        All News        Facebook Introduces Poke for Mobile
Google Said To Design The 'X Phone'     General Computing News      Japan Fair Trade Commission Clear Micron's Acquisition Of Elpida

Get RSS feed Easy Print E-Mail this Message

Related News
New Samsung Galaxy Tab S Series To Include Windows Version
Samsung Chief Arrested
Technicolor Files Patent Infringement Litigation Against Samsung
Apple Sold More Phones Than Samsung in the Fourth Quarter of 2016
Samsung Display Received Huge OLED Order by Apple
Samsung's Lee To Be Questioned Again On Suspicion of Bribery
TSMC, Samsung Take Different Approaches For 7nm
Galaxy S8's Artificial Intelligence Digital Assistant To Support Many Languages
Samsung Looks At Japanese Murata for S8 Batteries
Samsung Pay Mini Coming To Android Phones
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 Is Coming At MWC 2017
Samsung To Release New Tizen 3.0 Smartphone

Most Popular News
 
Home | News | All News | Reviews | Articles | Guides | Download | Expert Area | Forum | Site Info
Site best viewed at 1024x768+ - CDRINFO.COM 1998-2017 - All rights reserved -
Privacy policy - Contact Us .