BenQ DW1600A DL
15. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 3
Review Pages
2. Transfer Rate Reading Tests
3. CD Error Correction Tests
4. DVD Error Correction Tests
5. Protected Disc Tests
6. DAE Tests
7. Protected AudioCD Tests
8. CD Recording Tests
9. Writing Quality Tests - 3T Jitter Tests
10. Writing Quality Tests - C1 / C2 Error Measurements
11. DVD Recording Tests - Page 1
12. DVD Recording Tests - Page 2
13. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 1
14. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 2
15. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 3
16. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 4
17. DVD+R DL - Page 1
18. DVD+R DL - Page 2
19. DW1600A DL vs. SA300 - Page 1
20. DW1600A DL vs. SA300 - Page 2
21. DW1600A DL vs. SA300 - Page 3
22. DW1600A DL vs. SA300 - Page 4
23. Conclusion
BenQ DW1600A DL Recorder - Page 15
KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 3
In the following screenshots you can see the PI/PIF scans for the DVD+R/RW media we burned with the BenQ DW1600A DL. The software we used for all measurements is KProbe v2.1.0, and the reader is the LiteOn LDW-811S with "HS0Q patched" firmware, being able to read DVD±R/RW media up to 8X CAV. All scans have been performed at 8X with PI/PIF Sum8. Note that LiteOn drives cannot report PO but PIF errors, despite what KProbe reports. In addition, all discs have been scanned with PX-712A v1.01 using PlexTools v2.14 for comparison levels.
Comparing the KProbe/PlexTools scans we can see major differences in the reported PI/PIF error rates. The main explanation is that we have two different readers, with different pickup/chipset combinations, scanning at different reading speeds (8X CAV for KProbe, 2X CLV for PlexTools). It's interesting to see the disc scanned at low & high speed, since when error rate increases at a specific disc area, it should appear in both scans...else it would be, perhaps, a reading glitch of the tested reader.
Note: PI/PIF errors only give us a quick look at the error rate of the burned media. Those scans should be taken not as the absolute criteria of the burning quality but as an indication level.
-
12X writing speed
3A 8X DVD+R @ 12X
Maxell 8X DVD+R @ 12X
Philips 8X DVD+R @ 12X
LiteON 8X DVD+R @ 12X
- Summary
Some of the media that was recorded at 12X was 8X media. The DW1600A managed to make successful writings at 12X by using over-speed burning technology. As there isn't a lot of variety in 12X media on the market, this is a clever approach by BenQ. Good quality burns were reported by both KProbe and PlexTools. Minor quality problems reported with 3A 8X media (writing speed 12X) are not worthy of notice. It should be noted that with LiteOn 8X @ 12X media, KProbe scan reported a better quality burn than the Plextools scan.
- Appendix
Disc Label
|
Disc Information
|
Max Allowed Writing Speed
|
Total Recording Time
(mins)
|
3A 8X
|
Plasmon1 C01
|
12X
|
6:33
|
Philips 8X
|
PHILIPS C08
|
12X
|
6:28
|
LiteON 8X |
RICOHJPN R02 |
12X |
6:28 |
Maxell 8X |
MAXELL 002 |
12X |
6:27 |
Review Pages
2. Transfer Rate Reading Tests
3. CD Error Correction Tests
4. DVD Error Correction Tests
5. Protected Disc Tests
6. DAE Tests
7. Protected AudioCD Tests
8. CD Recording Tests
9. Writing Quality Tests - 3T Jitter Tests
10. Writing Quality Tests - C1 / C2 Error Measurements
11. DVD Recording Tests - Page 1
12. DVD Recording Tests - Page 2
13. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 1
14. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 2
15. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 3
16. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 4
17. DVD+R DL - Page 1
18. DVD+R DL - Page 2
19. DW1600A DL vs. SA300 - Page 1
20. DW1600A DL vs. SA300 - Page 2
21. DW1600A DL vs. SA300 - Page 3
22. DW1600A DL vs. SA300 - Page 4
23. Conclusion