LiteOn SOHW-832S
12. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 1
Review Pages
2. Transfer Rate Reading Tests
3. CD Error Correction Tests
4. DVD Error Correction Tests
5. Protected Disc Tests
6. DAE Tests
7. Protected AudioCD Tests
8. CD Recording Tests
9. CD Writing Quality - 3T Jitter Tests
10. CD Writing Quality - C1 / C2 Error Measurements
11. DVD Recording Tests
12. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 1
13. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 2
14. DVD+R DL Tests - Page 1
15. DVD+R DL Tests - Page 2
16. 832S vs. SA300 - Page 1
17. 832S vs. SA300 - Page 2
18. 832S vs. SA300 - Page 3
19. 832S vs. SA300 - Page 4
20. BookType Setting Feature
21. Conclusion
LiteON SOHW-832S Dual DVD±RW Recorder - Page 12
In the following screenshots you can see the PI/PIF scans for the DVD+R/RW media we burned with the LiteOn SOHW-832S. The software we used for all measurements is the KProbe v2.1.0, and the reader is the LiteOn LDW-811S with "HS0Q patched" firmware, being able to read DVD±R/RW media up to 8X CAV. All scans have been performed at 8X with PI/PIF Sum8. Note that LiteOn drives cannot report PO but PIF errors, despite what KProbe reports. In addition, all discs have been scanned with PX-712A v1.01 using PlexTools v2.13 for comparison levels.
Comparing the KProbe/PlexTools scans we can see major differences in the reported PI/PIF error rates. The main explanation is that we have two different readers, with different pickup/chipset combinations, scanning at different reading speeds (8X CAV for KProbe, 2X CLV for PlexTools). It's interesting to see the disc scanned at low & high speed, since when error rate increases at a specific disc area, it should appear in both scans...else it would be, perhaps, a reading glitch of the tested reader.
Note: PI/PIF errors only give us a quick look at the error rate of the burned media. Those scans should be taken not as the absolute criteria of the burning quality but as an indication level.
- DVD+R Media
CMC 8X DVD+R @ 8X
MCC 4X DVD+R @ 4X
MMore 4X DVD+R @ 8X
Plextor 4X @ 8X
Plextor 8X @ 8X
TraxData 4X @ 4X
TraxData 8X DVD+R @ 8X
- DVD+RW Media
Maxell 4X DVD+RW @ 4X
MKM 4X DVD+RW @ 4X
TraxData 4X DVD+RW @ 4X
- Summary
Judging from the PI/PIF scans we can say that the LiteON SOHW-832S performed well with the used DVD+R/+RW media. There are specific cases where the error rate was high and POF errors occurred, but this was a single occasion with Traxdata 4X DVD+RW media.
- Appendix
Disc Label |
Disc Information |
Max Allowed Writing Speed |
Total Recording Time (mins) |
Plextor 8X |
YUDEN000T02 |
8X |
9:06 |
Plextor 4X |
YUDEN000T01 |
8X |
8:38 |
CMC 8X |
CMC MAG E01 |
8X |
8:57 |
Verbatim 4X |
MMC 002 |
4X |
14:41 |
Traxdata 4X |
RICOHJPNR01 |
4X |
14:10 |
Traxdata 8X |
RITEK R03 |
8X |
8:58 |
MMore 4X |
MBIPG101R03 |
4X |
14:12 |
MKM 4X RW |
MKMA02 |
4X |
14:44 |
Maxell 4X RW |
Philips041 |
4X |
14:35 |
TraxData 4X RW |
RICOHJPNW11 |
4X |
13:47 |
Review Pages
2. Transfer Rate Reading Tests
3. CD Error Correction Tests
4. DVD Error Correction Tests
5. Protected Disc Tests
6. DAE Tests
7. Protected AudioCD Tests
8. CD Recording Tests
9. CD Writing Quality - 3T Jitter Tests
10. CD Writing Quality - C1 / C2 Error Measurements
11. DVD Recording Tests
12. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 1
13. KProbe/PlexTools Scans - Page 2
14. DVD+R DL Tests - Page 1
15. DVD+R DL Tests - Page 2
16. 832S vs. SA300 - Page 1
17. 832S vs. SA300 - Page 2
18. 832S vs. SA300 - Page 3
19. 832S vs. SA300 - Page 4
20. BookType Setting Feature
21. Conclusion