Teac DV-W58G-A
10. 3T Jitter Tests - Page 2
Review Pages
2. Data CD Reading Tests
3. CD Error Correction Tests
4. DVD reading tests
5. DVD Error Correction Tests
6. Protected Disc Tests
7. DAE Tests
8. CD Recording Tests
9. 3T Jitter Tests - Page 1
10. 3T Jitter Tests - Page 2
11. C1 / C2 Error Measurements
12. DVD Recording Tests
13. KProbe PI/PO quality tests
14. Conclusion
TEAC DV-W58G-A - Page 9
Writing Quality Tests - 3T Jitter Tests
Here we examine the writing quality of the drive at the maximum allowed speed, 40x, using this time media from different brands.
- 3T Pit results
All media reported good writing quality, but we still expected a better one. Intenso media had an extremely high level at the end of the recording area.
The above graph shows the average Pit values for each recorded disc.
- 3T Land results
Mam and Intenso didn't prove to be the best combination with this drive. All the other media had acceptable jitter levels.
Media Brand
|
Average 3T Pit Jitter (ns)
|
Average 3T Land Jitter (ns)
|
> 35ns
|
Max 3T jitter values (ns)
|
PHILIPS 52X
|
35.12
|
37.93
|
Yes
|
40 Pit, 40 Land
|
PLATINUM 52X
|
34.37
|
37.46
|
Yes
|
39 Pit, 40 Land
|
INTENSO 52X
|
37.66
|
44.24
|
Yes
|
54 Pit, 54 Land
|
SAMSUNG 52X
|
36.90
|
38.80
|
No
|
39 Pit, 41 Land
|
CMC Magnetics 48X
|
32.37
|
33.66
|
Yes
|
40 Pit, 38 Land
|
MAM 52X
|
33.76
|
39.20
|
Yes
|
39 Pit, 45 Land
|
Once again the maximum values for each disc were high. We expect a new firmware upgrade to improve the recording quality.
Review Pages
2. Data CD Reading Tests
3. CD Error Correction Tests
4. DVD reading tests
5. DVD Error Correction Tests
6. Protected Disc Tests
7. DAE Tests
8. CD Recording Tests
9. 3T Jitter Tests - Page 1
10. 3T Jitter Tests - Page 2
11. C1 / C2 Error Measurements
12. DVD Recording Tests
13. KProbe PI/PO quality tests
14. Conclusion