DVD-ROM Roundup Vol.4
7. DAE Tests
Review Pages
2. Samsung TS-H352A
3. LiteOn SOHD-167T
4. Transfer Rate Reading Tests
5. CD Error Correction Tests
6. DVD Error Correction Tests
7. DAE Tests
8. Protected AudioCDs
9. Protected Disc Tests
10. Asus vs S300
11. 167T vs S300
12. Hacked Firmware for Asus
13. Hacked Firmware for Samsung
14. Hacked Firmware for LiteOn
15. Conclusion
DVD-ROM Roundup Vol.4 - Page 7
- Pressed and CDR AudioCD results
Both the ASUS and LiteOn drives support 40X DAE speed while the Samsung 32X. The following results were reported when using Exact Audio Copy.
As was expected, the Samsung was the slowest while the other two reported similar performance with ASUS being fastest with a margin of 1X from the LiteOn. EAC also reported the following information for each drive:
Asus | |
Samsung | |
LiteOn |
- Advanced DAE Quality
All tested drives received a perfect quality score of 100. The average speed for the LiteOn was the fastest.
Asus
Samsung
LiteOn
- Ripping 90mins AudioCDs
- Ripping 99mins AudioCDs
Review Pages
2. Samsung TS-H352A
3. LiteOn SOHD-167T
4. Transfer Rate Reading Tests
5. CD Error Correction Tests
6. DVD Error Correction Tests
7. DAE Tests
8. Protected AudioCDs
9. Protected Disc Tests
10. Asus vs S300
11. 167T vs S300
12. Hacked Firmware for Asus
13. Hacked Firmware for Samsung
14. Hacked Firmware for LiteOn
15. Conclusion