Waitec Action16
9. 3T Jitter Tests
Review Pages
2. Transfer Rate Reading Tests
3. CD Error Correction Tests
4. DVD Error Correction Tests
5. Protected Disc Tests
6. DAE Tests
7. Protected AudioCDs
8. CD Recording Tests
9. 3T Jitter Tests
10. C1 / C2 Error Measurements
11. DVD Recording Tests
12. Media Support list
13. CDSpeed/PlexTools Scans - Page 1
14. CDSpeed/PlexTools Scans - Page 2
15. CDSpeed/PlexTools Scans - Page 3
16. CDSpeed/PlexTools Scans - Page 4
17. CDSpeed/PlexTools Scans - Page 5
18. DVD+R DL - Page 1
19. DVD+R DL - Page 2
20. Action 16 vs. SA300 - Page 1
21. Action 16 vs. SA300 - Page 2
22. Action 16vs. SA300 - Page 3
23. Action 16 vs. SA300 - Page 4
24. BookType Setting
25. Conclusion
Waitec Action 16 Recorder - Page 9
On this page you can see the 3T Pit & Land Jitter graphs using various media burned at 48X CAV writing speed.
- 3T Pit results
At 48X writing speed, most media reported high levels, which indicates bad performance. Best results were with Waitec and SKC media.
- 3T Land results
Once again, the Jitter test reports high 3T Land results. Best results came with Mmore and SKC media..
On the following page, we check the C1 and C2 error rates of the same discs, to come up with more specific conclusions.
Review Pages
2. Transfer Rate Reading Tests
3. CD Error Correction Tests
4. DVD Error Correction Tests
5. Protected Disc Tests
6. DAE Tests
7. Protected AudioCDs
8. CD Recording Tests
9. 3T Jitter Tests
10. C1 / C2 Error Measurements
11. DVD Recording Tests
12. Media Support list
13. CDSpeed/PlexTools Scans - Page 1
14. CDSpeed/PlexTools Scans - Page 2
15. CDSpeed/PlexTools Scans - Page 3
16. CDSpeed/PlexTools Scans - Page 4
17. CDSpeed/PlexTools Scans - Page 5
18. DVD+R DL - Page 1
19. DVD+R DL - Page 2
20. Action 16 vs. SA300 - Page 1
21. Action 16 vs. SA300 - Page 2
22. Action 16vs. SA300 - Page 3
23. Action 16 vs. SA300 - Page 4
24. BookType Setting
25. Conclusion