Gainward GT220 Vs Inno3D GT210
7. Benchmarks - Crysis Warhead (DirectX9, DirectX10)
Review Pages
2. The Gainward GeForce GT220
3. Testbed, benchmark software
4. DirectX 9, DirectX 10 Software
5. Benchmarks - FutureMark Hall Of Fame
6. Benchmarks - Crysis (DirectX10)
7. Benchmarks - Crysis Warhead (DirectX9, DirectX10)
8. Benchmarks - Company Of Heroes v1.71 (DirectX 10)
9. Benchmarks - Far Cry 2 (DirectX 9/10)
10. Benchmarks - -Half Life 2 Episode 2 (DirectX 9), Left4Dead, StreetFighter IV
11. CUDA compatibility, Overclocking
12. Final words
Compared to the original Crysis title, the latest "Crysis Warhead" features visual improvements in both the DirectX9 and the DirectX10 rendering modes.
Below you can see the test results we got at after testing the graphics cards at the possible resolutions with anti-aliasing disabled.
The Inno3D GT210 would theoretically perform decently at the resolution of 1280X1024 only. Even with the visual details set to ":Low", the card gave rather low scores, with an average rendering speed of 25.27. The lowest scores should be above 30FPS for action games like "Crysis Warhead", meaning that you cannot actually play Crysis with the GeForce GT210 series:
The performance of the Gainward GT220 is much better. You can go up to 1920x1200 using the " Performance" visual details, having good average FPS in both DX9/DX10 modes. If you stay at the 1280x1024 or lower and the DX9, you may be able to play game even at the "Mainstream" visual level.
So you'd better leave the rest modes to more powerful graphics cards.
The rest modes are for more powerful graphic cards..