Inno3D GT 240 iChiLL
4. Benchmarks - FutureMark Hall Of Fame
Review Pages
2. Testing platform
3. Testbed DirectX9/DirectX10
4. Benchmarks - FutureMark Hall Of Fame
5. Benchmarks - Crysis (DirectX10)
6. Benchmarks - Crysis Warhead (DirectX9, DirectX10), S.T.A.L.K.E.R: Call Of Pripyat Benchmark
7. Benchmarks - Company Of Heroes v1.71 (DirectX 10)
8. Benchmarks - Far Cry 2 (DirectX 9/10), Left4Dead (DirectX 9), StreetFighter IV (DirectX 9)
9. CUDA Compatibily
10. Overclocking, final words
The Futuremark benchmarks have been highly discussed among gamers and reviewers. For your information we post the results from 3DMark 05, 3DMark 06 and of course the latest 3DMark Vantage benchmarking software, which give you a rough idea of the performance of each graphics card.
The Inno3D GT 240 iChill XS3 gave a slightly higher performance than the Gainward GT 240 GS:
On the other hand, the Gainward GT 240 GS is faster than the Inno3D GT 240 iChill XS3 at the 3DMark 06 test:
The 3DMark Vantage offers a a clearer view of the card's performance at various resolutions. We can see a small difference in the scores of the two GT240-based cards from Gainward and Inno3D. Their differences in the core/memory/shaders clocks seems to have a affect in the performance while gaming, most of the times in favor of the Gainward card:
Review Pages
2. Testing platform
3. Testbed DirectX9/DirectX10
4. Benchmarks - FutureMark Hall Of Fame
5. Benchmarks - Crysis (DirectX10)
6. Benchmarks - Crysis Warhead (DirectX9, DirectX10), S.T.A.L.K.E.R: Call Of Pripyat Benchmark
7. Benchmarks - Company Of Heroes v1.71 (DirectX 10)
8. Benchmarks - Far Cry 2 (DirectX 9/10), Left4Dead (DirectX 9), StreetFighter IV (DirectX 9)
9. CUDA Compatibily
10. Overclocking, final words