Inno3D GT 240 iChiLL
5. Benchmarks - Crysis (DirectX10)
Review Pages
2. Testing platform
3. Testbed DirectX9/DirectX10
4. Benchmarks - FutureMark Hall Of Fame
5. Benchmarks - Crysis (DirectX10)
6. Benchmarks - Crysis Warhead (DirectX9, DirectX10), S.T.A.L.K.E.R: Call Of Pripyat Benchmark
7. Benchmarks - Company Of Heroes v1.71 (DirectX 10)
8. Benchmarks - Far Cry 2 (DirectX 9/10), Left4Dead (DirectX 9), StreetFighter IV (DirectX 9)
9. CUDA Compatibily
10. Overclocking, final words
Let's move on with the very demanding "Crysis" game. The majority of the graphics cards appearing in the table below offered acceptable frame rates at 1280x1024 (high quality settings).
Both the Inno3D GT 240 iChiLL and Gainward's GT240 GS gave exactly the same performance around 29.0 FPS:
The cards continued to perorm simiraly when we enabled the "Very high quality" settings. However, the FPS reported for each card make playing impossible, even at 1280 x 1024:
Review Pages
2. Testing platform
3. Testbed DirectX9/DirectX10
4. Benchmarks - FutureMark Hall Of Fame
5. Benchmarks - Crysis (DirectX10)
6. Benchmarks - Crysis Warhead (DirectX9, DirectX10), S.T.A.L.K.E.R: Call Of Pripyat Benchmark
7. Benchmarks - Company Of Heroes v1.71 (DirectX 10)
8. Benchmarks - Far Cry 2 (DirectX 9/10), Left4Dead (DirectX 9), StreetFighter IV (DirectX 9)
9. CUDA Compatibily
10. Overclocking, final words