Gainward GTX285
6. Benchmarks - Crysis Warhead (DirectX9, DirectX10)
Review Pages
2. Testbed
3. Benchmark settings
4. Benchmarks - FutureMark Hall Of Fame
5. Benchmarks - Crysis (DirectX10)
6. Benchmarks - Crysis Warhead (DirectX9, DirectX10)
7. Performance comparison - Crysis Warhead
8. Benchmarks - Company Of Heroes v1.71 (DirectX 10)
9. Benchmarks - Far Cry 2 (DirectX 9/10)
10. Benchmarks - Half Life 2 Episode 2 (DirectX 9), Left4Dead
11. Overclocking, conclusions
Compared to the original Crysis game title, Crysis Warhead offers many visual improvements in both DirectX9 and DirectX10 rendering modes.
For the test below we kept anti-alising disabled and took some FPS measurements for all the quality settings and various resolutions:B
DX9 |
1280x1024 |
1680x1050 |
1920x1200 |
|||
Low |
Average |
Low |
Average |
Low |
Average |
|
Performance |
47,15 |
130,16 |
45,71 |
128,33 |
48,74 |
126,77 |
Mainstream |
35,47 |
80,08 |
33,78 |
76,46 |
33,00 |
74,26 |
Gamer |
23,29 |
57,46 |
24,02 |
51,57 |
24,65 |
45,07 |
Enthusiast |
18,38 |
43,05 |
18,58 |
35,26 |
19,17 |
29,21 |
The Gainward GTX285 performed well even at the Enthusiast level, where the lowest reported FPS was 18FPS. Of course the "Gamer" level is highly playable even at 1920x1200.
When we enabled the DirectX10, the reported FPS changed. Again the Gamer level remains a very good choice, where you can enjoy high frame rates. The Enthusiast level seems more demanding especially at the higher resolutions.
DX10 |
1280x1024 |
1680x1050 |
1920x1200 |
|||
Low |
Average |
Low |
Average |
Low |
Average |
|
Performance | 67,73 |
121,68 |
49,94 |
116,91 |
49,61 |
117,54 |
Mainstream | 38,47 |
78,15 |
36,32 |
73,11 |
37,12 |
67,82 |
Gamer | 21,63 |
51,75 |
22,26 |
43,91 |
22,59 |
39,42 |
Enthusiast | 20,29 |
36,64 |
19,10 |
30,48 |
11,43 |
25,23 |