Philips ED16DVDR external
15. PlexTools Scans - Page 3
Review Pages
2. Transfer Rate Reading Tests
3. CD Error Correction Tests
4. DVD Error Correction Tests
5. Protected Disc Tests
6. DAE Tests
7. Protected AudioCDs
8. CD Recording Tests
9. Writing Quality Tests - 3T Jitter Tests
10. Writing Quality Tests - C1 / C2 Error Measurements
11. DVD Recording Tests
12. Mesia Supported List
13. PlexTools Scans - Page 1
14. PlexTools Scans - Page 2
15. PlexTools Scans - Page 3
16. PlexTools Scans - Page 4
17. PlexTools Scans - Page 5
18. PlexTools Scans - Page 6
19. PlexTools Scans - Page 7
20. DVD+R DL - Page 1
21. DVD+R DL - Page 2
22. ED16DVDR DL vs. SA300 - Page 1
23. ED16DVDR DL vs. SA300 - Page 2
24. ED16DVDR DL vs. SA300 - Page 3
25. ED16DVDR DL vs. SA300 - Page 4
26. Booktype BitSetting
27. Conclusion
Philips ED16DVDR DL Recorder - Page 15
PlexTools Scans - Page 3
In order to test the writing quality and reliability of the burned media, we used two readers in combination with two software packages:
- The LiteON SOHD-167T with patched firmware being able to read DVD5 up to 16X CAV and DVD9 up to 10X CAV. For the transfer rate tests, we used the latest Nero CDSpeed version.
- The Plextor PX-712A with the latest available firmware. For scanning the disc, we used the latest PlexTools version at 2X CLV reading speed, BURST mode, with middle accuracy.
In general, a "perfect" disc should have a smooth reading curve, very low PIE/POE and zero (0) POF error rates. Most times, even when a disc has very low PIE/POE error rates, the reading curve may not be smooth with dropoffs. Due to the fact that we oversped the reading capabilities of the LiteON SOHD-167T, such drops are expected, especially near the outer area of the disc.
The measurements below should be taken not as the absolute criteria of the burning quality, but as an indication level.
8X DVD+R Writing Speed
- 3A 8X DVD+R @ 8X
- BeAll 8X DVD+R @ 8X
- BenQ 8X DVD+R @ 8X
- MKM (Verbatim) 8X DVD+R @ 8X
- Taiyo Yuden 8X DVD+R @ 8X
- TDK 8X DVD+R @ 8X
- Summary
Taiyo Yuden and TDK media had the best writing quality. Their error levels were low while CDSpeed produced a very smooth graph in the case of TY media.
Review Pages
2. Transfer Rate Reading Tests
3. CD Error Correction Tests
4. DVD Error Correction Tests
5. Protected Disc Tests
6. DAE Tests
7. Protected AudioCDs
8. CD Recording Tests
9. Writing Quality Tests - 3T Jitter Tests
10. Writing Quality Tests - C1 / C2 Error Measurements
11. DVD Recording Tests
12. Mesia Supported List
13. PlexTools Scans - Page 1
14. PlexTools Scans - Page 2
15. PlexTools Scans - Page 3
16. PlexTools Scans - Page 4
17. PlexTools Scans - Page 5
18. PlexTools Scans - Page 6
19. PlexTools Scans - Page 7
20. DVD+R DL - Page 1
21. DVD+R DL - Page 2
22. ED16DVDR DL vs. SA300 - Page 1
23. ED16DVDR DL vs. SA300 - Page 2
24. ED16DVDR DL vs. SA300 - Page 3
25. ED16DVDR DL vs. SA300 - Page 4
26. Booktype BitSetting
27. Conclusion