Toshiba Exceria M303 64GB and M501 Exceria Pro 64GB MicroSDXC review
3. Benchmarks - EXCERIA PRO M501 64GB
Review Pages
2. Benchmarks - Exceria M303 64GB
3. Benchmarks - EXCERIA PRO M501 64GB
4. Summary
The Exceria M501 64GB MicroSDXC hit the 210 MB/s and 142 MB/s in the sequential readd and write tests, respectively. The read speed is slower than the 270 MB/s promised by Toshiba, while write was as fast as we expected.
Below you see the performance of the M501 64GB compared to what we measuerd with the Lexar 1800x 64GB UHS-II and the ExceriaPro N101 64GB cards. Generally, the new M501 64GB was a bit slower in the read tests, espacially in the random read tasks.
CrystalDiskMark Read |
|||
Toshiba ExceriaPro M501 64GB | Lexar 1800x 64GB UHS-II | Toshiba ExceriaPro N101 64GB | |
Seq | 209.2 MB/s | 205 MB/s | 213.2 MB/s |
512K | 163.2 MB/s | 173.6 MB/s | 196.4 MB/s |
Seq Q32T1 | 192.8 MB/s | 190.6 MB/s | 194.2 MB/s |
4K | 7.527 MB/s | 13.62 MB/s | 12.28 MB/s |
4K Q32T1 |
10.74 MB/s | 16.05 MB/s | 16.76 MB/s |
The M501 was slower than the rest cards in the sequential write and read tasks:
CrystalDiskMark Write |
|||
Toshiba ExceriaPro M501 64GB | Lexar 1800x 64GB UHS-II | Toshiba ExceriaPro N101 64GB | |
Seq | 142.6 MB/s | 199.9 MB/s | 214 MB/s |
512K | 96.42 MB/s | 2.935 MB/s | 30.03 MB/s |
Seq Q32T1 | 138.5 MB/s | 191.8 MB/s | 186.9 MB/s |
4K | 1.754 MB/s | 1.440 MB/s | 1.131 MB/s |
4K Q32T1 |
1.940 MB/s | 2.647 MB/s | 1.205 MB/s |
The ATTO Disc benchmark confirmed the similar reading performacne of the card in the test, and the lag of the M501 in the write tests:
Review Pages
2. Benchmarks - Exceria M303 64GB
3. Benchmarks - EXCERIA PRO M501 64GB
4. Summary