Toshiba Exceria M303 64GB and M501 Exceria Pro 64GB MicroSDXC review
3. Benchmarks - EXCERIA PRO M501 64GB
Review Pages
1. Meet the Exceria M303 64GB and the EXCERIA PRO M501 64GB microSDXC
2. Benchmarks - Exceria M303 64GB
3. Benchmarks - EXCERIA PRO M501 64GB
4. Summary
2. Benchmarks - Exceria M303 64GB
3. Benchmarks - EXCERIA PRO M501 64GB
4. Summary
The Exceria M501 64GB MicroSDXC hit the 210 MB/s and 142 MB/s in the sequential readd and write tests, respectively. The read speed is slower than the 270 MB/s promised by Toshiba, while write was as fast as we expected.
 |
 |
Below you see the performance of the M501 64GB compared to what we measuerd with the Lexar 1800x 64GB UHS-II and the ExceriaPro N101 64GB cards. Generally, the new M501 64GB was a bit slower in the read tests, espacially in the random read tasks.
CrystalDiskMark Read |
|||
| Toshiba ExceriaPro M501 64GB | Lexar 1800x 64GB UHS-II | Toshiba ExceriaPro N101 64GB | |
| Seq | 209.2 MB/s | 205 MB/s | 213.2 MB/s |
| 512K | 163.2 MB/s | 173.6 MB/s | 196.4 MB/s |
| Seq Q32T1 | 192.8 MB/s | 190.6 MB/s | 194.2 MB/s |
| 4K | 7.527 MB/s | 13.62 MB/s | 12.28 MB/s |
4K Q32T1 |
10.74 MB/s | 16.05 MB/s | 16.76 MB/s |
The M501 was slower than the rest cards in the sequential write and read tasks:
CrystalDiskMark Write |
|||
| Toshiba ExceriaPro M501 64GB | Lexar 1800x 64GB UHS-II | Toshiba ExceriaPro N101 64GB | |
| Seq | 142.6 MB/s | 199.9 MB/s | 214 MB/s |
| 512K | 96.42 MB/s | 2.935 MB/s | 30.03 MB/s |
| Seq Q32T1 | 138.5 MB/s | 191.8 MB/s | 186.9 MB/s |
| 4K | 1.754 MB/s | 1.440 MB/s | 1.131 MB/s |
4K Q32T1 |
1.940 MB/s | 2.647 MB/s | 1.205 MB/s |
The ATTO Disc benchmark confirmed the similar reading performacne of the card in the test, and the lag of the M501 in the write tests:
Review Pages
1. Meet the Exceria M303 64GB and the EXCERIA PRO M501 64GB microSDXC
2. Benchmarks - Exceria M303 64GB
3. Benchmarks - EXCERIA PRO M501 64GB
4. Summary
2. Benchmarks - Exceria M303 64GB
3. Benchmarks - EXCERIA PRO M501 64GB
4. Summary
0 Comments